Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 29832 for des.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32546 - 2008-04-28
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32546 - 2008-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Mucek, 252 Wis. 2d 426, ¶28. ¶17 We turn to the grant of summary judgment. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
. See Mucek, 252 Wis. 2d 426, ¶28. ¶17 We turn to the grant of summary judgment. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
State v. Carl F. Hickman
decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ANALYSIS Nature and Consequences of the Plea ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ANALYSIS Nature and Consequences of the Plea ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243215 - 2019-07-02
review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243215 - 2019-07-02
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Karen C.
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the historical facts to constitutional principals presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108029 - 2017-09-21
of the historical facts to constitutional principals presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davidson, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69580 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davidson, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69580 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl F. Hickman
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19