Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 45891 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 45891 for paternity test paper work.
John Trenhaile v. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
-damages claim; (2) reduced his compensatory damages for incomplete and non-complying work; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5834 - 2005-03-31
-damages claim; (2) reduced his compensatory damages for incomplete and non-complying work; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Appellants’ “implicit[] acknowledge[ment] that their challenge cannot survive the all applications test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977261 - 2025-07-02
and Appellants’ “implicit[] acknowledge[ment] that their challenge cannot survive the all applications test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977261 - 2025-07-02
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
erred by failing to suppress the results of field sobriety tests given inside her residence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
erred by failing to suppress the results of field sobriety tests given inside her residence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daryl G. Hoffmann
right to due process was violated when the State failed to preserve a vehicle for testing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8054 - 2005-03-31
right to due process was violated when the State failed to preserve a vehicle for testing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8054 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
in six respects, and for failing to seek “new” DNA testing in his original postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28209 - 2007-02-26
in six respects, and for failing to seek “new” DNA testing in his original postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28209 - 2007-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Frank
of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Wisconsin employs the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21
of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Wisconsin employs the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Elm
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are reviewed under the two-pronged test set out by the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are reviewed under the two-pronged test set out by the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daryl G. Hoffmann
a vehicle for testing, concluding that the test results might have played a significant role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8054 - 2017-09-19
a vehicle for testing, concluding that the test results might have played a significant role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8054 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
“new” DNA testing in his original postconviction motion. We No. 2005AP1255 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28209 - 2014-09-15
“new” DNA testing in his original postconviction motion. We No. 2005AP1255 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28209 - 2014-09-15
State v. Duane E. Elm
are reviewed under the two‑pronged test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
are reviewed under the two‑pronged test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31