Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 8550 for dell precision t3601.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 8550 for dell precision t3601.
State v. Gerald L. Larson
. In setting forth a fact-specific evidentiary showing, a defendant must describe as precisely as possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18500 - 2005-06-14
. In setting forth a fact-specific evidentiary showing, a defendant must describe as precisely as possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18500 - 2005-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
)). The exercise of discretion does not lend itself to “mathematical precision,” nor do we require the recitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59990 - 2011-02-14
)). The exercise of discretion does not lend itself to “mathematical precision,” nor do we require the recitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59990 - 2011-02-14
State v. Thomas J. Wilde
)). The challenged ordinance “need not define with absolute clarity and precision what is and what is not unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4830 - 2005-03-31
)). The challenged ordinance “need not define with absolute clarity and precision what is and what is not unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ardie Byrd
was not an entirely accurate or precise statement of the penalties, we conclude that the plea hearing as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19
was not an entirely accurate or precise statement of the penalties, we conclude that the plea hearing as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
precision the exercise of sentencing discretion”). By the Court.—Judgments and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29781 - 2014-09-15
precision the exercise of sentencing discretion”). By the Court.—Judgments and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29781 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(“no appellate-court-imposed tuner can ever modulate with exacting precision the exercise of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30157 - 2007-09-04
(“no appellate-court-imposed tuner can ever modulate with exacting precision the exercise of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30157 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Terrence M. Jordan
. This is precisely one purpose for the rule in § 901.03(1)(a), STATS. Since Jordan’s motion to strike was untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11526 - 2017-09-19
. This is precisely one purpose for the rule in § 901.03(1)(a), STATS. Since Jordan’s motion to strike was untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11526 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles W. Johnson
explain its sentencing with that level of precision. The trial court cited many factors justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
explain its sentencing with that level of precision. The trial court cited many factors justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
State v. Orbbie Williams
that it did not require mathematical precision. Id., ¶49. “We do expect, however, an explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
that it did not require mathematical precision. Id., ¶49. “We do expect, however, an explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
CA Blank Order
to explain why it imposed a twelve-year sentence. We see no error. Mathematical precision is not required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94447 - 2013-03-26
to explain why it imposed a twelve-year sentence. We see no error. Mathematical precision is not required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94447 - 2013-03-26