Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 29713 for des.
Date: November 15, 2010 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 3 Opinions for Release On Nov...
On November 16, 2010 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2009AP001871 City of De Pere v. Town
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56841 - 2010-11-14
On November 16, 2010 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2009AP001871 City of De Pere v. Town
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56841 - 2010-11-14
Errata
of Appeals District IV Ten East Doty Street, Suite 700 Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Robert De Chambeau Circuit
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30016 - 2007-08-14
of Appeals District IV Ten East Doty Street, Suite 700 Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Robert De Chambeau Circuit
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30016 - 2007-08-14
[PDF]
AP000096 2020 WI App 61 Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha
, Jr. 2019AP001851 2020 WI App 67 Timothy M. Casa De Calvo, Jr. v. Town of Hudson 2019AP001857 2020 WI
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301078 - 2020-11-30
, Jr. 2019AP001851 2020 WI App 67 Timothy M. Casa De Calvo, Jr. v. Town of Hudson 2019AP001857 2020 WI
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301078 - 2020-11-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478417 - 2022-03-24
court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478417 - 2022-03-24
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: Voces De La Frontera, Inc. and Christine Neuman Ortiz, Petitioners-Respondents, v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185099 - 2017-09-21
: Voces De La Frontera, Inc. and Christine Neuman Ortiz, Petitioners-Respondents, v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael Montey v. Steve's on Bluemound
¶5 Applying the well-known methodology that need not be repeated here, this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15663 - 2017-09-21
¶5 Applying the well-known methodology that need not be repeated here, this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nancy Leibly v. Ronald P. Leibly
. Ronald did not appear for the hearing. No. 98-2670-FT 3 Ronald filed a motion for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14509 - 2017-09-21
. Ronald did not appear for the hearing. No. 98-2670-FT 3 Ronald filed a motion for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14509 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the injunction presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The dispute among the parties arises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238119 - 2019-03-27
the injunction presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The dispute among the parties arises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238119 - 2019-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
even though the party has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30471 - 2007-10-01
even though the party has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30471 - 2007-10-01