Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 6369 for dr.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 6369 for dr.
[PDF]
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
would be in the best interests of the child. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman, the mother’s expert, opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16245 - 2017-09-21
would be in the best interests of the child. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman, the mother’s expert, opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16245 - 2017-09-21
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
would be in the best interests of the child. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman, the mother’s expert, opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
would be in the best interests of the child. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman, the mother’s expert, opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Helen E. Cook v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
Cook appeals a judgment on a jury verdict finding Dr. Thomas Rankin did not engage in medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5202 - 2017-09-19
Cook appeals a judgment on a jury verdict finding Dr. Thomas Rankin did not engage in medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rogelio Cabral v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Cabral filed a report prepared in September 1991 by Dr. Henry Lenard, a vocational expert. Dr. Lenard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8390 - 2017-09-19
. Cabral filed a report prepared in September 1991 by Dr. Henry Lenard, a vocational expert. Dr. Lenard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8390 - 2017-09-19
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
On the first day of trial, evidence was presented that on April 18, 2001, Dr. Robert Kalember diagnosed Janella
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6953 - 2005-03-31
On the first day of trial, evidence was presented that on April 18, 2001, Dr. Robert Kalember diagnosed Janella
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn R. Lee
to the recommendation of the court-appointed psychologist, Dr. Hurlbut. Lee contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
to the recommendation of the court-appointed psychologist, Dr. Hurlbut. Lee contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that information on a “strip.” ¶3 Jennifer was admitted to the hospital in the morning. Dr. Bruce Abrams took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79150 - 2014-09-15
that information on a “strip.” ¶3 Jennifer was admitted to the hospital in the morning. Dr. Bruce Abrams took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79150 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
though, that “[s]he did not strike out to my knowledge.” ¶7 Dr. Piering concluded that Mary F.-R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87624 - 2013-11-25
though, that “[s]he did not strike out to my knowledge.” ¶7 Dr. Piering concluded that Mary F.-R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87624 - 2013-11-25
State v. Patricia A. Nichols
During the trial, the four veterinarians who visited Nichols’s farm to treat the animals, Drs. Phyllis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3629 - 2005-03-31
During the trial, the four veterinarians who visited Nichols’s farm to treat the animals, Drs. Phyllis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the only two witnesses at the supervised released hearing. Thorin’s first witness, Dr. William Schmitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262804 - 2020-06-02
the only two witnesses at the supervised released hearing. Thorin’s first witness, Dr. William Schmitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262804 - 2020-06-02