Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 29424 for er.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 29424 for er.
[PDF]
Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
First, he claims the trial court erred in determining that he was not entitled to damages for Tucker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4125 - 2017-09-20
First, he claims the trial court erred in determining that he was not entitled to damages for Tucker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4125 - 2017-09-20
State v. Rafeal D. Newson
erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19655 - 2005-09-19
erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19655 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in Bradley’s possession.2 Bradley argues that the trial court erred in ordering her to sell the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41970 - 2014-09-15
in Bradley’s possession.2 Bradley argues that the trial court erred in ordering her to sell the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41970 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gustavo Espino
, for first-degree intentional homicide, party to a crime. Espino claims that the trial court erred: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
, for first-degree intentional homicide, party to a crime. Espino claims that the trial court erred: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred when it prohibited videoconference testimony at trial. According to Allen, the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138607 - 2015-03-30
court erred when it prohibited videoconference testimony at trial. According to Allen, the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138607 - 2015-03-30
State v. Anthansiou C. Kourtidias
erred by: (1) admitting “other acts” evidence, (2) allowing testimony concerning his parole status, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8934 - 2005-03-31
erred by: (1) admitting “other acts” evidence, (2) allowing testimony concerning his parole status, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8934 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was the victim or was acting with the victim’s consent or authorization; (2) that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290803 - 2020-09-24
was the victim or was acting with the victim’s consent or authorization; (2) that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290803 - 2020-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion. On appeal, Matson argues: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to enforce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
the motion. On appeal, Matson argues: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to enforce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support the charges, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141755 - 2015-05-13
was insufficient to support the charges, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141755 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On appeal, M.C. argues the circuit court erred by: (1) failing to appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238823 - 2019-04-09
. On appeal, M.C. argues the circuit court erred by: (1) failing to appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238823 - 2019-04-09