Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 6143 for li.
Search results 1741 - 1750 of 6143 for li.
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34954 - 2014-09-15
¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34954 - 2014-09-15
Amy B. McCormick v. Daniel J. McCormick
The division of divisible property lies within the trial court’s discretion. Ashraf v. Ashraf, 134 Wis. 2d 336
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7497 - 2005-03-31
The division of divisible property lies within the trial court’s discretion. Ashraf v. Ashraf, 134 Wis. 2d 336
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7497 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and the specific reasons underlying his sentence. ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32893 - 2008-06-02
and the specific reasons underlying his sentence. ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32893 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“impossible testimony as convincing evidence,” and “the [County’s] witness … lied numerous times under oath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97435 - 2014-09-15
“impossible testimony as convincing evidence,” and “the [County’s] witness … lied numerous times under oath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97435 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2007AP1381-CR 3 ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court, and a strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32893 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2007AP1381-CR 3 ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court, and a strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
was required to grant the motion for a mistrial. ¶10 The decision whether to grant a mistrial lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35789 - 2014-09-15
was required to grant the motion for a mistrial. ¶10 The decision whether to grant a mistrial lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Umhoefer
on an ultimate fact. The decision of whether to grant a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11701 - 2017-09-20
on an ultimate fact. The decision of whether to grant a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11701 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2007AP1077 3 knowingly and voluntarily entered because his trial lawyer lied to him regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32655 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2007AP1077 3 knowingly and voluntarily entered because his trial lawyer lied to him regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32655 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
his trial attorney lied to him about the sentence he would receive. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2013-12-09
his trial attorney lied to him about the sentence he would receive. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2013-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
credibility determination. The jury determined that Huml lied about paying Krisik and thus Huml intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35285 - 2009-01-20
credibility determination. The jury determined that Huml lied about paying Krisik and thus Huml intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35285 - 2009-01-20