Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17401 - 17410 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17401 - 17410 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68293 - 2011-07-24
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68293 - 2011-07-24
Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75496 - 2011-12-19
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75496 - 2011-12-19
State v.
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alfredo Vega
and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31
and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
demanded a jury trial. ¶9 Interpreting Gerard’s jury trial demand as a petition for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33875 - 2008-09-02
demanded a jury trial. ¶9 Interpreting Gerard’s jury trial demand as a petition for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33875 - 2008-09-02
Kirk Bintzler v. Warden Thomas Borgen
by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo, Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18284 - 2005-05-25
by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo, Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18284 - 2005-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute, and our review is de novo. See id., 2005 WI 126, ¶16, 285 Wis. 2d at 154, 699 N.W.2d at 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
are not in dispute, and our review is de novo. See id., 2005 WI 126, ¶16, 285 Wis. 2d at 154, 699 N.W.2d at 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71554 - 2011-09-28
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71554 - 2011-09-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence.” Id.; WIS. STAT. § 102.23(6). We review LIRC’s legal conclusions de novo, but “in evaluating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507076 - 2022-04-13
evidence.” Id.; WIS. STAT. § 102.23(6). We review LIRC’s legal conclusions de novo, but “in evaluating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507076 - 2022-04-13