Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17411 - 17420 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17411 - 17420 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 42
. § 302.11(7)(am) and (b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Juneau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21
. § 302.11(7)(am) and (b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Juneau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
application before the plan commission, which presents a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68297 - 2011-07-20
application before the plan commission, which presents a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68297 - 2011-07-20
State v. Jameel A. Ali
-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31
-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be a question of law that we review de novo. See Theuer v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 2001 WI 26, ¶5, 242
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58207 - 2010-12-22
be a question of law that we review de novo. See Theuer v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 2001 WI 26, ¶5, 242
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58207 - 2010-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
was deficient and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31447 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31447 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191802 - 2017-09-21
assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80630 - 2014-09-15
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80630 - 2014-09-15
Shirley Gorchals v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
, is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections, 192 Wis.2d 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13547 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections, 192 Wis.2d 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kirk Bintzler v. Warden Thomas Borgen
). Because whether a claim is barred by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18284 - 2017-09-21
). Because whether a claim is barred by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243215 - 2019-07-02
review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243215 - 2019-07-02