Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17411 - 17420 of 66444 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 17411 - 17420 of 66444 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
99-02 In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 70.40 -- Venue in Prisoner Cases
. (fm) Whether the case should be dismissed without requiring the defendant to answer for a reason
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001 - 2017-09-20
. (fm) Whether the case should be dismissed without requiring the defendant to answer for a reason
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001 - 2017-09-20
99-02 In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 70.40 -- Venue in Prisoner Cases
be dismissed without requiring the defendant to answer for a reason set forth in s. 802.05 (3) (b), stats
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1174 - 2005-03-31
be dismissed without requiring the defendant to answer for a reason set forth in s. 802.05 (3) (b), stats
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1174 - 2005-03-31
State v. Torey U. Jennings
, Jennings pled no contest to the two misdemeanors, and the State dismissed the felony. On the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12974 - 2005-03-31
, Jennings pled no contest to the two misdemeanors, and the State dismissed the felony. On the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
99-02 In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 70.40 -- Venue in Prisoner Cases
. (fm) Whether the case should be dismissed without requiring the defendant to answer for a reason
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1174 - 2017-09-19
. (fm) Whether the case should be dismissed without requiring the defendant to answer for a reason
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1174 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismiss and read in the remaining counts from this case and a traffic forfeiture case. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700692 - 2023-09-13
dismiss and read in the remaining counts from this case and a traffic forfeiture case. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700692 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court dismissing the Village’s action in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258833 - 2020-04-29
. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court dismissing the Village’s action in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258833 - 2020-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He argues that the circuit court’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He argues that the circuit court’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismiss and read in the remaining counts from this case and a traffic forfeiture case. The parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700692 - 2023-09-13
dismiss and read in the remaining counts from this case and a traffic forfeiture case. The parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700692 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
State v. Leon R. McQueen
. He contends the trial court erred in denying, at the conclusion of the refusal hearing, his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4243 - 2017-09-19
. He contends the trial court erred in denying, at the conclusion of the refusal hearing, his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4243 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
coverage. The court subsequently denied a motion for reconsideration. ¶5 Following this ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96119 - 2014-09-15
coverage. The court subsequently denied a motion for reconsideration. ¶5 Following this ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96119 - 2014-09-15