Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17421 - 17430 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17421 - 17430 of 30115 for de.
The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11503 - 2010-07-19
one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11503 - 2010-07-19
2011 WI APP 42
is not “long standing” and thus “great weight” deference is inappropriate. De novo review is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60297 - 2012-01-22
is not “long standing” and thus “great weight” deference is inappropriate. De novo review is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60297 - 2012-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis. 2d 288, 766 N.W.2d 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74678 - 2011-12-06
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis. 2d 288, 766 N.W.2d 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74678 - 2011-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
that requested a trial de novo with a six-person jury instead of a trial on the record. ¶4 The matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53101 - 2014-09-15
that requested a trial de novo with a six-person jury instead of a trial on the record. ¶4 The matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53101 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument that the circuit court’s failure to use the term “best interests” in its analysis does not de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597208 - 2022-12-06
argument that the circuit court’s failure to use the term “best interests” in its analysis does not de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597208 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Leonard Avery
offense instruction is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. In addition, we must view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9779 - 2017-09-19
offense instruction is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. In addition, we must view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9779 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Circuit Court, requesting a trial de novo before a six-person jury. The trial court set a pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
Circuit Court, requesting a trial de novo before a six-person jury. The trial court set a pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, but decide de novo the legal question of whether counsel was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142860 - 2017-09-21
clearly erroneous, but decide de novo the legal question of whether counsel was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142860 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02