Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17421 - 17430 of 20953 for word.
Search results 17421 - 17430 of 20953 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of that malice and acknowledges that in-house counsel employed a plain meaning reading of the words “three-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903740 - 2025-01-22
of that malice and acknowledges that in-house counsel employed a plain meaning reading of the words “three-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903740 - 2025-01-22
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
tracks the wording of the statute, and contains the same ambiguity as does the statute. Even if it were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
tracks the wording of the statute, and contains the same ambiguity as does the statute. Even if it were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee County v. Edward S.
arm was removed and once again given to Pope John Paul, II. In other words, I was sold to the church
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24624 - 2006-03-27
arm was removed and once again given to Pope John Paul, II. In other words, I was sold to the church
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24624 - 2006-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
version of the statute, with slightly different wording: “… [o]nly to the extent that it is actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35980 - 2009-03-25
version of the statute, with slightly different wording: “… [o]nly to the extent that it is actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35980 - 2009-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
] In other words, Corish was required to “make such disclosures as [would] enable a reasonable person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125621 - 2014-11-03
] In other words, Corish was required to “make such disclosures as [would] enable a reasonable person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125621 - 2014-11-03
John C. Koshick a/k/a Jack Koshick v. State
the meaning of the word “claim”: “Upon the refusal of the legislature to allow a claim against the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19546 - 2005-10-27
the meaning of the word “claim”: “Upon the refusal of the legislature to allow a claim against the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19546 - 2005-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
at the time.” Id. In other words, we indulge “a strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146989 - 2015-08-24
at the time.” Id. In other words, we indulge “a strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146989 - 2015-08-24
Eau Claire County Dept. of Human Services v. Timothy G.
disposition regarding this child. In other words, if the court were to find after a trial that [Timothy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2774 - 2005-03-31
disposition regarding this child. In other words, if the court were to find after a trial that [Timothy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2774 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
would be admissible in separate trials.” Id. at 210. In other words, if evidence of one count would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72355 - 2011-10-17
would be admissible in separate trials.” Id. at 210. In other words, if evidence of one count would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72355 - 2011-10-17
Ruth Genke v. NDC, Inc.
In other words, it is undisputed that the Genkes did not file a timely notice of appeal from the NDC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5621 - 2005-03-31
In other words, it is undisputed that the Genkes did not file a timely notice of appeal from the NDC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5621 - 2005-03-31