Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17441 - 17450 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17441 - 17450 of 29942 for des.
State v. Tremaine Y.
application to undisputed facts is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7614 - 2005-03-31
application to undisputed facts is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is authorized under a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo, State v. Lee, 2008 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101061 - 2013-08-20
is authorized under a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo, State v. Lee, 2008 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101061 - 2013-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Joanne Sekula
of law which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3712 - 2017-09-19
of law which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3712 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14445 - 2017-09-21
review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14445 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the information that should have been provided by the circuit court, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
the information that should have been provided by the circuit court, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Sentry appeal. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54241 - 2014-09-15
and Sentry appeal. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54241 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
WIS. STAT. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3301 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3301 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James W. Whistleman
of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3192 - 2017-09-19
of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. at 128. A. Objection to “Escape Evidence” ¶10 On the second day of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81988 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id. at 128. A. Objection to “Escape Evidence” ¶10 On the second day of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81988 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leon J. Seese
standard of probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Turner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13079 - 2005-03-31
standard of probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Turner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13079 - 2005-03-31