Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17441 - 17450 of 75273 for public records.
Search results 17441 - 17450 of 75273 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
. On this record, we conclude that the circuit court appropriately exercised its discretion in refusing to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
. On this record, we conclude that the circuit court appropriately exercised its discretion in refusing to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Tamara Norwood-Thomas
for possession with intent to deliver. Specifically, she claims the record lacks any evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12932 - 2017-09-21
for possession with intent to deliver. Specifically, she claims the record lacks any evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12932 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tamara Norwood-Thomas
to deliver. Specifically, she claims the record lacks any evidence to support the “with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12932 - 2005-03-31
to deliver. Specifically, she claims the record lacks any evidence to support the “with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12932 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103795 - 2017-09-21
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103795 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision was necessary to protect the public and to avoid unduly No. 2017AP2269 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234551 - 2019-02-12
supervision was necessary to protect the public and to avoid unduly No. 2017AP2269 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234551 - 2019-02-12
CA Blank Order
of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101127 - 2013-08-18
of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101127 - 2013-08-18
[PDF]
WI 28
a prior criminal record." Ultimately, the prosecutor recommended "a substantial prison sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63767 - 2014-09-15
a prior criminal record." Ultimately, the prosecutor recommended "a substantial prison sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63767 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
serious by the fact that the defendant does have a prior criminal record." Ultimately, the prosecutor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63767 - 2011-05-09
serious by the fact that the defendant does have a prior criminal record." Ultimately, the prosecutor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63767 - 2011-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
were barred and grant Schott’s motion for summary judgment without a full factual record. Despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102327 - 2013-09-25
were barred and grant Schott’s motion for summary judgment without a full factual record. Despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102327 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
BACKGROUND ¶4 The following facts, taken from the record before the circuit court, are undisputed. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
BACKGROUND ¶4 The following facts, taken from the record before the circuit court, are undisputed. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14