Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17451 - 17460 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17451 - 17460 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. The Winnebago County Courthouse Employees Association
review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199, 407 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Ct. App. 1987). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8126 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199, 407 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Ct. App. 1987). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8126 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10930 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10930 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501492 - 2022-03-31
assistance of counsel is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501492 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
Kirk Bintzler v. Warden Thomas Borgen
). Because whether a claim is barred by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18284 - 2017-09-21
). Because whether a claim is barred by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial, however, are questions of law which we review and decide de novo. Id. ¶12 An ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223827 - 2018-10-24
prejudicial, however, are questions of law which we review and decide de novo. Id. ¶12 An ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223827 - 2018-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
included offense instruction should be submitted to a jury is a question of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10024 - 2017-09-19
included offense instruction should be submitted to a jury is a question of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
included offense instruction should be submitted to a jury is a question of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19
included offense instruction should be submitted to a jury is a question of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27