Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17461 - 17470 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 17461 - 17470 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Cholewinski
A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. Cross v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19
A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. Cross v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
was dismissed because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12947 - 2017-09-21
was dismissed because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12947 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
children. Wooden claimed that on the date of the offense, she and Herring had attended a party in Chicago
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
children. Wooden claimed that on the date of the offense, she and Herring had attended a party in Chicago
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel. Ross filed a response asserting various claims of error, and appellate counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209897 - 2018-03-15
counsel. Ross filed a response asserting various claims of error, and appellate counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209897 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
claims he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John T. Neita
modification; and (5) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Neita claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9832 - 2017-09-19
modification; and (5) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Neita claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9832 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Sobjeck also argues the funds in the deposit account were exempt from the claims of creditors. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32974 - 2014-09-15
. Sobjeck also argues the funds in the deposit account were exempt from the claims of creditors. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32974 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael R. Remmel
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
State v. Travis E. Blanks
claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because § 971.05(3), Stats., was not complied with. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because § 971.05(3), Stats., was not complied with. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Avery
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31