Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17461 - 17470 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17461 - 17470 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
State v. Taurius S. Fluker
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing is a question of law we review de novo. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82459 - 2012-05-15
. Whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing is a question of law we review de novo. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82459 - 2012-05-15
Courtyard Condominium Association, Inc. v. Barbara Draper
de novo. See Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2771 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2771 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of this issue presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Church, 2003 WI 74, ¶17, 262 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
of this issue presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Church, 2003 WI 74, ¶17, 262 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous; however, we determine de novo whether or when a seizure occurred. Id. ¶8 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
clearly erroneous; however, we determine de novo whether or when a seizure occurred. Id. ¶8 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22