Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17461 - 17470 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17461 - 17470 of 29942 for des.
09AP5 State v. Jill Y. Treleven.doc
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Jill Y. Treleven contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Jill Y. Treleven contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
State v. Earl W. Haase
of law that we review de novo. State v. Storlie, 2002 WI App 163, ¶6, 256 Wis. 2d 500, 647 N.W.2d 926
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
of law that we review de novo. State v. Storlie, 2002 WI App 163, ¶6, 256 Wis. 2d 500, 647 N.W.2d 926
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
American World, Inc. v. City of Wisconsin Dells
. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council, 38 Wis.2d 518, 525, 157 N.W.2d 568, 571 (1968). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10296 - 2005-03-31
. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council, 38 Wis.2d 518, 525, 157 N.W.2d 568, 571 (1968). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10296 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Nagel
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Only facts material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56843 - 2010-12-19
to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Only facts material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56843 - 2010-12-19
James E. Johnson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law we review de novo. Richland County DSS v. DHSS, 183 Wis.2d 61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law we review de novo. Richland County DSS v. DHSS, 183 Wis.2d 61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31
Roy F. Bartels v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7161 - 2005-03-31
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7161 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amy M. Yulga
the circumstances of a search or seizure meet constitutional standards is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18029 - 2005-05-04
the circumstances of a search or seizure meet constitutional standards is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18029 - 2005-05-04
Harvest States Cooperatives v. Timothy Anderson
of Milwaukee v. Northrup Data Sys., 602 F.2d 767, 771 (7th Cir. 1979). We decide questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13052 - 2005-03-31
of Milwaukee v. Northrup Data Sys., 602 F.2d 767, 771 (7th Cir. 1979). We decide questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13052 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24945 - 2006-04-27
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24945 - 2006-04-27