Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 29942 for des.
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. If the motion meets this standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. If the motion meets this standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Brownson
its obligations; rather, Brownson contends that the State de facto withdrew from the agreement because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13207 - 2005-03-31
its obligations; rather, Brownson contends that the State de facto withdrew from the agreement because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13207 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason L. S.
interpretation are questions of law which this court reviews de novo. Town of Clearfield v. Cushman, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8716 - 2005-03-31
interpretation are questions of law which this court reviews de novo. Town of Clearfield v. Cushman, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8716 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46417 - 2013-04-23
this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46417 - 2013-04-23
07AP2584 Robert Zellner v. Daryl Herrick
of its intent to release the transcript. Zellner sought de novo judicial review contending
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34696 - 2008-11-25
of its intent to release the transcript. Zellner sought de novo judicial review contending
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34696 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80630 - 2014-09-15
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111941 - 2017-09-21
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111941 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30