Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Jackson, 2016 WI 56, ¶45, 369 Wis. 2d 673, 882 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462785 - 2021-12-15
is a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Jackson, 2016 WI 56, ¶45, 369 Wis. 2d 673, 882 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462785 - 2021-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Aurelio Magdariaga
for an evidentiary hearing for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10991 - 2017-09-19
for an evidentiary hearing for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10991 - 2017-09-19
State v. April O.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16017 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16017 - 2005-03-31
Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
the County to examine the record de novo and permit Cellular One to introduce its evidence regarding other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2005-03-31
the County to examine the record de novo and permit Cellular One to introduce its evidence regarding other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46417 - 2010-01-27
this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46417 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate and present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57399 - 2014-09-15
are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate and present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57399 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. (italics added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143393 - 2017-09-21
right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. (italics added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143393 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15