Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 68630 for law.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 68630 for law.
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. Upon reemployment, they exercised the option, granted them under federal law, to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
. Upon reemployment, they exercised the option, granted them under federal law, to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because law enforcement: (1) unreasonably expanded the scope of the initial stop in order to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259710 - 2020-05-12
because law enforcement: (1) unreasonably expanded the scope of the initial stop in order to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259710 - 2020-05-12
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
fired Barr and retained the law firm of Aiken & Scoptur. Morters fired Aiken & Scoptur in 1995 because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6535 - 2005-03-31
fired Barr and retained the law firm of Aiken & Scoptur. Morters fired Aiken & Scoptur in 1995 because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6535 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 59
to adequately explain its decision to revoke Daniels’ license when the administrative law judge only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32059 - 2014-09-15
to adequately explain its decision to revoke Daniels’ license when the administrative law judge only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32059 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Theresa Huml v. Robert W. Vlazny
that the drafting committee looked to the federal law governing restitution for assistance in amending Wisconsin’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19582 - 2017-09-21
that the drafting committee looked to the federal law governing restitution for assistance in amending Wisconsin’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 58
on the brief of James J. Gende, Gende Law Office, Pewaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19
on the brief of James J. Gende, Gende Law Office, Pewaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
WI 18
, Chairperson of the Criminal Law Section of the State Bar of Wisconsin. The court voted to seek written
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634082 - 2023-03-14
, Chairperson of the Criminal Law Section of the State Bar of Wisconsin. The court voted to seek written
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634082 - 2023-03-14
Mary D. Gillies v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
that it was contrary to law, arbitrary and oppressive, and unsupported by substantial evidence. Gillies supports her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11790 - 2005-03-31
that it was contrary to law, arbitrary and oppressive, and unsupported by substantial evidence. Gillies supports her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary D. Gillies v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
the PRB’s decision on the grounds that it was contrary to law, arbitrary and oppressive, and unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11790 - 2017-09-20
the PRB’s decision on the grounds that it was contrary to law, arbitrary and oppressive, and unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11790 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Powers
on the briefs of Walter A. Piel, Jr. of Raymond Law Office, Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6879 - 2017-09-20
on the briefs of Walter A. Piel, Jr. of Raymond Law Office, Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6879 - 2017-09-20