Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17481 - 17490 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17481 - 17490 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Counsel’s Actions in Relation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238603 - 2019-04-04
assistance was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Counsel’s Actions in Relation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238603 - 2019-04-04
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Lentowski
that of resentencing the defendantde novo. We conclude, however, that a brief discussion of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11403 - 2017-09-19
that of resentencing the defendantde novo. We conclude, however, that a brief discussion of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11403 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. Piddington, 241 Wis. 2d 754, ¶13.4 ¶8 Wick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33447 - 2014-09-15
. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. Piddington, 241 Wis. 2d 754, ¶13.4 ¶8 Wick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33447 - 2014-09-15
09AP5 State v. Jill Y. Treleven.doc
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Jill Y. Treleven contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Jill Y. Treleven contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo a circuit court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109084 - 2014-03-18
de novo a circuit court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109084 - 2014-03-18
Eliud Velez v. Jon Litscher
the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto policy.” His point in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31
the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto policy.” His point in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, but apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI 137, ¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91939 - 2013-01-22
de novo, but apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI 137, ¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91939 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id. Ultimately, it is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23
a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id. Ultimately, it is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23