Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17481 - 17490 of 68284 for did.
Search results 17481 - 17490 of 68284 for did.
CA Blank Order
good cause to toll the time limits, and Carrie S. did not object. There would be no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106830 - 2014-01-21
good cause to toll the time limits, and Carrie S. did not object. There would be no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106830 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a manifest injustice justifying plea withdrawal because he did not understand important legal principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34196 - 2008-10-01
a manifest injustice justifying plea withdrawal because he did not understand important legal principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34196 - 2008-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2017-18).1 Williams did not file a response.2 Upon review, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340785 - 2021-02-24
merit. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2017-18).1 Williams did not file a response.2 Upon review, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340785 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that medication Mather was taking did not interfere with her ability to understand the proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183669 - 2017-09-21
that medication Mather was taking did not interfere with her ability to understand the proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) law enforcement did not have a search warrant; (4) the State lied at sentencing when it stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470798 - 2022-01-11
) law enforcement did not have a search warrant; (4) the State lied at sentencing when it stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470798 - 2022-01-11
State v. Howard L. Goodman
else of yours should be taken care of. Did you ever think of that? DEFENDANT: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5515 - 2005-03-31
else of yours should be taken care of. Did you ever think of that? DEFENDANT: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court denied the motion, reasoning the motion did not identify a new factor that justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
, the circuit court denied the motion, reasoning the motion did not identify a new factor that justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Max P. Funmaker, Jr.
believes to be an unlawful interference with another person by such other person.” Counsel did not ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14133 - 2014-09-15
believes to be an unlawful interference with another person by such other person.” Counsel did not ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14133 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard W. Foelker
that he did not participate in the discussion between Foelker and the physician and did nothing to cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10528 - 2017-09-20
that he did not participate in the discussion between Foelker and the physician and did nothing to cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10528 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that, under Fotusky v. ProHealth Care, Inc., 2023 WI App 19, 407 Wis. 2d 554, 991 N.W.2d 502, Clarke did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20
that, under Fotusky v. ProHealth Care, Inc., 2023 WI App 19, 407 Wis. 2d 554, 991 N.W.2d 502, Clarke did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20