Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17491 - 17500 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17491 - 17500 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29860 - 2014-09-15
determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29860 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37755 - 2014-09-15
to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Aurelio Magdariaga
for an evidentiary hearing for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10991 - 2017-09-19
for an evidentiary hearing for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10991 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56843 - 2014-09-15
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Earl Johnson v. Jon E. Litscher
that we review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Capoun Revocable Trust v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2655 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Capoun Revocable Trust v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lorena M. Gribou v. Adam J. Hall
as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. See Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16216 - 2017-09-21
as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. See Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16216 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. No. 2011AP600 4 DISCUSSION ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78373 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id. No. 2011AP600 4 DISCUSSION ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
due process raise[s a] question[] of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo.” Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208765 - 2018-02-27
due process raise[s a] question[] of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo.” Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208765 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo whether those facts demonstrate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362235 - 2021-05-05
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo whether those facts demonstrate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362235 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
WI APP 183
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34520 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34520 - 2014-09-15