Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed with the State’s description of the joint recommendation. ¶4 On May 5, 2009, the court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62842 - 2014-09-15
agreed with the State’s description of the joint recommendation. ¶4 On May 5, 2009, the court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62842 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on revocation to be five and one-half years. Boyer agreed with the State’s description of the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62842 - 2011-04-13
on revocation to be five and one-half years. Boyer agreed with the State’s description of the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62842 - 2011-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-9th and followed the joint sentencing recommendation. A year later, Brady filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
-9th and followed the joint sentencing recommendation. A year later, Brady filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the intervening plaintiffs, together with all defendants, filed a joint motion for the court to recognize a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444379 - 2021-10-21
and the intervening plaintiffs, together with all defendants, filed a joint motion for the court to recognize a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444379 - 2021-10-21
[PDF]
WI APP 170
that Gerald and Lisa had joint custody and joint placement of Jessica. The placement schedule attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41979 - 2014-09-15
that Gerald and Lisa had joint custody and joint placement of Jessica. The placement schedule attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41979 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
that Gerald and Lisa had joint custody and joint placement of Jessica. The placement schedule attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41979 - 2009-11-23
that Gerald and Lisa had joint custody and joint placement of Jessica. The placement schedule attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41979 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the challenged guidance, and the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. The court held oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
of the challenged guidance, and the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. The court held oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
CA Blank Order
and imposed a sentence consistent with the joint recommendation. There is no manifest injustice upon which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131833 - 2014-12-15
and imposed a sentence consistent with the joint recommendation. There is no manifest injustice upon which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131833 - 2014-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in.” 2 Evans filed a “Motion [For] Release On Bond Pending Appeal and Motion to Stay Sentence Pending
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131833 - 2017-09-21
in.” 2 Evans filed a “Motion [For] Release On Bond Pending Appeal and Motion to Stay Sentence Pending
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131833 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the challenged guidance, and the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. The court held oral
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
of the challenged guidance, and the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. The court held oral
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11