Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu baja double Bluto Kabupaten Sumenep Jawa Timur.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu baja double Bluto Kabupaten Sumenep Jawa Timur.
State v. Dimitri Henley
Henley argues that the second trial was a violation of his right to be free from double jeopardy, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4490 - 2005-03-31
Henley argues that the second trial was a violation of his right to be free from double jeopardy, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4490 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reconfinement order violated Bowers’s equal protection rights and improperly subjected him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
reconfinement order violated Bowers’s equal protection rights and improperly subjected him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
State v. Billy J. Doudna
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prohibition against double jeopardy. That argument is also undeveloped, but additionally, Poirier did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
prohibition against double jeopardy. That argument is also undeveloped, but additionally, Poirier did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adverse to the State “if the appeal would not be prohibited by constitutional protections against double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
adverse to the State “if the appeal would not be prohibited by constitutional protections against double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
Michael Kidd v. Dianna L. McMaster
supreme court laid out these policies. First, the awarding of double damages and attorney fees encourages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6030 - 2005-03-31
supreme court laid out these policies. First, the awarding of double damages and attorney fees encourages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6030 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pervis Merritt
, 277 N.W.2d 462, 464-65 (Ct. App. 1979). Multiple convictions for the same offense violate the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
, 277 N.W.2d 462, 464-65 (Ct. App. 1979). Multiple convictions for the same offense violate the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 100.18 (2013-14),1 and requested compensatory and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147173 - 2017-09-21
. § 100.18 (2013-14),1 and requested compensatory and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147173 - 2017-09-21
State v. Claude Lowery
that ch. 980 violates his rights against double jeopardy, cruel and unusual punishment, and substantive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2005-03-31
that ch. 980 violates his rights against double jeopardy, cruel and unusual punishment, and substantive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2005-03-31