Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 13657 for commencing.

CA Blank Order
. In 2010, Landon commenced a lawsuit under Wis Stat. ch. 843 to establish a prescriptive right to use
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101244 - 2013-08-27

COURT OF APPEALS
Records Law. An action under the Open Records Law must be commenced by petition for writ of mandamus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56501 - 2010-11-08

State v. Allen L.
of the relevant facts. Prior to the commencement of the instant TPR action, the State had commenced a proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2776 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
following his 2001 conviction after revocation. However, after Obriecht commenced this appeal he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26594 - 2006-09-27

Timothy Oddsen v. City of Milwaukee
commenced this lawsuit to obtain Oddsen’s “pension benefit that would have been provided had Oddsen elected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12845 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. It commenced this action to reverse the Village’s annexation decision on the ground that it was contrary to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60001 - 2011-02-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to the vehicle because Ronald did not disclose his ownership of the vehicle as of the commencement of the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because Ronald did not disclose his ownership of the vehicle as of the commencement of the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73299 - 2014-09-15

Gwendolyn Lawver v. Marshfield Clinic
discussions whether Sommerness would also represent Venture I if the Lawvers commenced suit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7777 - 2005-03-31

Waylon M. Redding v. David H. Schwarz
of Corrections (DOC) commenced a revocation proceeding. Four days later, on the DOC’s petition, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31