Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 8541 for dell precision t3601.
Search results 1751 - 1760 of 8541 for dell precision t3601.
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Edwards
because the blood test is more “intrusive.”3 ¶6 We have recently considered, and rejected, precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
because the blood test is more “intrusive.”3 ¶6 We have recently considered, and rejected, precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
under subsection (1). Finally, it is unclear precisely what Ebben intends to argue with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027369 - 2025-10-22
under subsection (1). Finally, it is unclear precisely what Ebben intends to argue with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027369 - 2025-10-22
Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
, but before Marcelle filed his reply brief, we issued a decision on this precise issue in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31
, but before Marcelle filed his reply brief, we issued a decision on this precise issue in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to precisely when she discussed the advantages and disadvantages of [the] medications with [the patient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176197 - 2017-09-21
as to precisely when she discussed the advantages and disadvantages of [the] medications with [the patient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176197 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shawn E. Braxton
precisely what occurred because he was intoxicated. He explains that his conduct was prompted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12317 - 2017-09-21
precisely what occurred because he was intoxicated. He explains that his conduct was prompted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12317 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
also challenges his sentence as unduly harsh. We rejected that precise issue in Gilmore I. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29779 - 2014-09-15
also challenges his sentence as unduly harsh. We rejected that precise issue in Gilmore I. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29779 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to explain why it imposed a twelve-year sentence. We see no error. Mathematical precision is not required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94447 - 2013-03-26
to explain why it imposed a twelve-year sentence. We see no error. Mathematical precision is not required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94447 - 2013-03-26
State v. Charles W. Johnson
explain its sentencing with that level of precision. The trial court cited many factors justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
explain its sentencing with that level of precision. The trial court cited many factors justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles W. Johnson
explain its sentencing with that level of precision. The trial court cited many factors justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14688 - 2005-03-31
explain its sentencing with that level of precision. The trial court cited many factors justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14688 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)). The exercise of discretion does not lend itself to “mathematical precision,” nor do we require the recitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59990 - 2011-02-14
)). The exercise of discretion does not lend itself to “mathematical precision,” nor do we require the recitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59990 - 2011-02-14