Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17501 - 17510 of 50122 for our.

[PDF] WI APP 234
.” Domino, 118 Wis. 2d at 491. ¶16 More recently, in Lodl, our supreme court further clarified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26842 - 2014-09-15

2010 WI APP 10
jurisdiction over Wheeler. Whether a court has personal jurisdiction is a question of law subject to our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15

[PDF] WI APP 65
.2d 53, 56 (Ct. App. 2011). This appeal requires that we apply statutes to contracts, and our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
stop is a seizure within the meaning of our Constitutions.”). Rather, the issue presented here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672242 - 2023-06-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in this matter run consecutive to, rather than concurrent to, his Kenosha County sentences.2 Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031079 - 2025-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
204, 674 N.W.2d 665. However, when the exercise of such discretion turns upon a question of law, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32726 - 2008-05-20

State v. Kevin L. Jones
). Wisconsin case law, moreover, supports our conclusion. While in State v. Lukensmeyer, 140 Wis.2d 92, 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12659 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harry S. Bernstein
. Bernstein from the beginning did not wish a Jury Trial. We waived our right to have a Jury Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14351 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI APP 122
to less than $75,000. She cited the concurrence in our previous decision in this case as suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38152 - 2009-08-25

State v. Giles L. Smith
with the right not to be tried while incompetent is a question of statutory construction. Our goal in statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31