Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17501 - 17510 of 20937 for word.

Trista Auman v. School District of Stanley-Boyd
activity" as those words are used in § 895.52(2)(a).[2] Trista entered the school property for educational
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16415 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[.]” Id. We do not read words that are not there into the text of a statute. See State v. Fitzgerald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547329 - 2022-07-26

RingTrue, Inc. v. Hollis McWethy
that it was predominantly for services. It determined that hourly billing rates and use of the words “design,” “development
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15110 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark A. Flood
would have said so. In other words, the regulation would have specifically prohibited the tie-in sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7908 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the wording of the statute, and contains the same ambiguity as does the statute. Even if it were reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5624 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ronald J. Howe v. Neenah Springs, Inc.
and effect. In other words, the Howes and Neenah expressly agreed that the 1991 amended royalty agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5385 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 22
with a required notice of assessment. In other words, if no notice of assessment was required under § 70.365
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106579 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constructing and maintaining pipelines. Except for the legal descriptions, the wording of the two easements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103118 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
benefits, and one of those witnesses testified that Schmidt actually used the word “litigation”—albeit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667905 - 2023-06-13

COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶52 In other words, Virsnieks is correct that the jury must determine, based on the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66108 - 2011-06-20