Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17511 - 17520 of 86227 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress 2 Daun Patumbak Deli Serdang.
Search results 17511 - 17520 of 86227 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress 2 Daun Patumbak Deli Serdang.
COURT OF APPEALS
, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from the refusal hearing. Jamie Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from the refusal hearing. Jamie Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the postconviction motion. Nos. 2011AP1010-CR 2011AP1011-CR 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, J.2 Daryl J. Teska
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79282 - 2014-09-15
the postconviction motion. Nos. 2011AP1010-CR 2011AP1011-CR 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, J.2 Daryl J. Teska
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79282 - 2014-09-15
Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying facts are undisputed. On August 23, 2003, Lankford was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7557 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying facts are undisputed. On August 23, 2003, Lankford was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7557 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
extended to the order even though the notice only mentioned the judgment). ¶2 On appeal, Robinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72540 - 2011-10-24
extended to the order even though the notice only mentioned the judgment). ¶2 On appeal, Robinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72540 - 2011-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
finding of a substantial change in circumstances is unsupported by the record. We affirm. ¶2 Mark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66958 - 2011-07-05
finding of a substantial change in circumstances is unsupported by the record. We affirm. ¶2 Mark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66958 - 2011-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
law. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 At a little after 11:00 p.m. in May 2011, a Sheboygan county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
law. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 At a little after 11:00 p.m. in May 2011, a Sheboygan county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
State v. Charles E. Luitze
was not required to consider alternatives to revocation. State v. Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶2, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6606 - 2005-03-31
was not required to consider alternatives to revocation. State v. Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶2, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6606 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Dana is the biological mother of Eternity and Sierra
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4246 - 2005-03-31
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Dana is the biological mother of Eternity and Sierra
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4246 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen E. Lee
and sentenced as a habitual criminal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 939.62 (1999-2000).[2] On appeal, Lee contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5946 - 2005-03-31
and sentenced as a habitual criminal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 939.62 (1999-2000).[2] On appeal, Lee contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5946 - 2005-03-31
10AP2672 State v. Matthew M. Gilbert.doc
: patrick c. haughney, Judge.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[2] In this appeal, Matthew M. Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05
: patrick c. haughney, Judge.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[2] In this appeal, Matthew M. Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05