Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17511 - 17520 of 30115 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
. The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33709 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135949 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80630 - 2014-09-15

State v. Tyrone Jackson
application of the penalty enhancers is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9180 - 2005-03-31

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Committee
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16146 - 2005-03-31

WI App 98 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP476 Complete Title of ...
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86094 - 2012-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
performance was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21

COURT OF APPEALS
this court reviews de novo. Honthaners Restaurants, Inc. v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 273, ¶10, 240 Wis. 2d 234, 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32168 - 2008-04-06

The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11503 - 2005-03-31

Charles Chvala v. Danford C. Bubolz
(Ct. App. 1985). We are not bound by the trial court's conclusions and review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9951 - 2005-03-31