Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17511 - 17520 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17511 - 17520 of 29942 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a question of law that we consider de novo, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75106 - 2012-01-02
a question of law that we consider de novo, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75106 - 2012-01-02
Earl Johnson v. Jon E. Litscher
). The grant or denial of summary judgment is an issue of law that we review de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2655 - 2005-03-31
). The grant or denial of summary judgment is an issue of law that we review de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2655 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts. Interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35918 - 2009-03-18
to undisputed facts. Interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35918 - 2009-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing is a question of law we review de novo. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82459 - 2012-05-15
. Whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing is a question of law we review de novo. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82459 - 2012-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36010 - 2009-05-11
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36010 - 2009-05-11
Courtyard Condominium Association, Inc. v. Barbara Draper
de novo. See Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2771 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2771 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of this issue presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Church, 2003 WI 74, ¶17, 262 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
of this issue presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Church, 2003 WI 74, ¶17, 262 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
is also de novo. Campion v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 172 Wis.2d 405, 410, 493 N.W.2d 244, 246 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2005-03-31
is also de novo. Campion v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 172 Wis.2d 405, 410, 493 N.W.2d 244, 246 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio J. Spencer
, subject to this court’s de novo review. Id. 1. Counsel’s failure to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
, subject to this court’s de novo review. Id. 1. Counsel’s failure to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
State v. James S. Riedel
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31