Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17541 - 17550 of 29817 for des.
Search results 17541 - 17550 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standards to undisputed facts, which presents a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805050 - 2024-05-23
standards to undisputed facts, which presents a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805050 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. II. DISCUSSION ¶6 An appellate court reviews a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
. II. DISCUSSION ¶6 An appellate court reviews a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ultimately is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
ultimately is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
, both of which involve the interpretation of § 343.305, STATS., and are subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14954 - 2017-09-21
, both of which involve the interpretation of § 343.305, STATS., and are subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Perk E. Thomas
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cathy Strozinsky v. School District of Brown Deer
. This appeal followed. II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13641 - 2017-09-21
. This appeal followed. II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
and interest. ¶5 Barbara requested and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6672 - 2017-09-20
and interest. ¶5 Barbara requested and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6672 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Bernard Willkomm v. Romeo Soriano, M.D.
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3618 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3618 - 2017-09-19