Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17551 - 17560 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17551 - 17560 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
prediction about the likelihood of reoffense is not possible. On the other hand, the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30318 - 2007-10-30
prediction about the likelihood of reoffense is not possible. On the other hand, the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30318 - 2007-10-30
[PDF]
State v. John Allen
, in part, on the following statement he made to the trial court: THE DEFENDANT: It was to my knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5695 - 2017-09-19
, in part, on the following statement he made to the trial court: THE DEFENDANT: It was to my knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5695 - 2017-09-19
State v. Percell L. Parker
to the following statement made by the court: “[A]lthough I do believe [Mrs.] Stefanski that she brought the stuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2014-03-03
to the following statement made by the court: “[A]lthough I do believe [Mrs.] Stefanski that she brought the stuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2014-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
provides that a prior statement by a witness is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30049 - 2007-08-21
provides that a prior statement by a witness is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30049 - 2007-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
statement by a witness is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
statement by a witness is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s closing argument] was not a statement of the law at all, let alone a misstatement of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193616 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s closing argument] was not a statement of the law at all, let alone a misstatement of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193616 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 237
in a situation where the police are there and they make a statement, I refer to it as kind of an excited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30717 - 2014-09-15
in a situation where the police are there and they make a statement, I refer to it as kind of an excited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30717 - 2014-09-15
State v. Terry Thomas
as “unverified statements of a number of alleged witnesses.” The prosecutor then read from the complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13011 - 2005-03-31
as “unverified statements of a number of alleged witnesses.” The prosecutor then read from the complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13011 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony, and because his trial counsel did not object when the prosecutor made an incorrect statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132234 - 2017-09-21
testimony, and because his trial counsel did not object when the prosecutor made an incorrect statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Sanders. In C.H.’s statement to that detective, he said that the armed men were wearing hooded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862726 - 2025-02-24
of Sanders. In C.H.’s statement to that detective, he said that the armed men were wearing hooded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862726 - 2025-02-24