Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17561 - 17570 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17561 - 17570 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Alphonso L. Robinson
competent witness is telling the truth. Id. at 96. We determined that the psychiatrist’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
competent witness is telling the truth. Id. at 96. We determined that the psychiatrist’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea, a full statement, and her truthful testimony against Smith in this and two other cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245954 - 2019-08-28
plea, a full statement, and her truthful testimony against Smith in this and two other cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245954 - 2019-08-28
[PDF]
State v. David S. Frederick
by failing to make a determination with respect to the voluntariness of his statement; and (5) determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
by failing to make a determination with respect to the voluntariness of his statement; and (5) determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
to suppress the statement Jorgensen made to the police officer about Gary being the driver. Second, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the statement Jorgensen made to the police officer about Gary being the driver. Second, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a statement in which he admitted his involvement in the shootings.[1] At the arraignment, Landrum—who suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
a statement in which he admitted his involvement in the shootings.[1] At the arraignment, Landrum—who suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Lester Young
are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15919 - 2017-09-21
are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15919 - 2017-09-21
State v. Percell L. Parker
to the following statement made by the court: “[A]lthough I do believe [Mrs.] Stefanski that she brought the stuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31
to the following statement made by the court: “[A]lthough I do believe [Mrs.] Stefanski that she brought the stuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tom Sweeney
of the evidence, Sweeney made a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence, Sweeney made a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert D. Stewart
cause to investigate the accident and to arrest Stewart. The court also found that Stewart’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
cause to investigate the accident and to arrest Stewart. The court also found that Stewart’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide, namely, that Carson acted with intent to kill Spears. During his opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258774 - 2020-04-28
intentional homicide, namely, that Carson acted with intent to kill Spears. During his opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258774 - 2020-04-28