Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Kevin J. Pok v. David E. McCauley
of the trial court's pretrial order, at the first trial defense counsel stated in opening statement, “You're
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8318 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court's pretrial order, at the first trial defense counsel stated in opening statement, “You're
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lisa B. v. William J.T., Sr.
, William, Sr. moved for a mistrial based on Smith’s statements. He argued that Smith improperly invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19
, William, Sr. moved for a mistrial based on Smith’s statements. He argued that Smith improperly invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lester Young
) and (6), the following are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31
) and (6), the following are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the many positive character witnesses who made statements on Boozer’s behalf. This court has received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647477 - 2023-04-26
by the many positive character witnesses who made statements on Boozer’s behalf. This court has received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647477 - 2023-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the prosecutor’s statement was not sufficiently harmful. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
and that the prosecutor’s statement was not sufficiently harmful. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression of Fields’ in-custody statement; and (3) sentencing. To address the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
suppression of Fields’ in-custody statement; and (3) sentencing. To address the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
a statement in which he admitted his involvement in the shootings.[1] At the arraignment, Landrum—who suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
a statement in which he admitted his involvement in the shootings.[1] At the arraignment, Landrum—who suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
State v. Alphonso L. Robinson
competent witness is telling the truth. Id. at 96. We determined that the psychiatrist’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
competent witness is telling the truth. Id. at 96. We determined that the psychiatrist’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
to suppress the statement Jorgensen made to the police officer about Gary being the driver. Second, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the statement Jorgensen made to the police officer about Gary being the driver. Second, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alphonso L. Robinson
that the psychiatrist’s statement was tantamount to saying the daughter was telling the truth. Id. We reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2854 - 2017-09-19
that the psychiatrist’s statement was tantamount to saying the daughter was telling the truth. Id. We reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2854 - 2017-09-19