Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 65135 for or b.
Search results 17581 - 17590 of 65135 for or b.
[PDF]
State v. Jerry A. Foskett
is a combination of the following factors: (a) it was “bar time;” (b) Foskett was speeding; (c) his eyes were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2269 - 2017-09-19
is a combination of the following factors: (a) it was “bar time;” (b) Foskett was speeding; (c) his eyes were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2269 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b). ¶7 The County’s burden at the refusal hearing was to “present evidence sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34330 - 2008-10-15
)(b). ¶7 The County’s burden at the refusal hearing was to “present evidence sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34330 - 2008-10-15
State v. Rosalinda S.
evidence to support the jury’s finding. B. Discretionary Reversal. ¶8 Mr. K. next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6322 - 2005-03-31
evidence to support the jury’s finding. B. Discretionary Reversal. ¶8 Mr. K. next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Sturm
this). In addition, Sturm relies on the language of WIS. STAT. § 346.34(1)(b), which requires use of a turn signal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
this). In addition, Sturm relies on the language of WIS. STAT. § 346.34(1)(b), which requires use of a turn signal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
State v. James R. Schiller
, and the record would not support such a finding. b. Improper prosecutorial motive or purpose ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2574 - 2005-03-31
, and the record would not support such a finding. b. Improper prosecutorial motive or purpose ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2574 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
A party moving for a modification of physical placement under Wis. Stat. § 767.451(1)(b)1. (2007-08)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04
A party moving for a modification of physical placement under Wis. Stat. § 767.451(1)(b)1. (2007-08)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04
[PDF]
William Becker v. John C. Tritschler
- At the conclusion of the trial, the court ruled: “[B]ased on a preponderance of the credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9681 - 2017-09-19
- At the conclusion of the trial, the court ruled: “[B]ased on a preponderance of the credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9681 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
into place the provision authorized by Wis. Stat. § 632.32(5)(b) (2009-10),[2] that a policy issued to anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74616 - 2011-12-06
into place the provision authorized by Wis. Stat. § 632.32(5)(b) (2009-10),[2] that a policy issued to anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74616 - 2011-12-06
State v. Steven A. Conway
in violation of § 941.20(1)(b), Stats. Conway contends that manifest justice requires he be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
in violation of § 941.20(1)(b), Stats. Conway contends that manifest justice requires he be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Philipp v. Odyssey Re (London) Limited
County: JAMES B. MOHR, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Myse, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14983 - 2017-09-21
County: JAMES B. MOHR, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Myse, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14983 - 2017-09-21