Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17591 - 17600 of 30169 for consulta de causas.
Search results 17591 - 17600 of 30169 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, J.[1] Daniel J. Fouliard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34031 - 2008-09-16
: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, J.[1] Daniel J. Fouliard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34031 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Brown
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Dilworth
purposes is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo based on the facts as found by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
purposes is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo based on the facts as found by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
City of New Berlin v. Jeffery D. Eggum
, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14059 - 2005-03-31
, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14059 - 2005-03-31
Cochran v. Public Service Commission
and jurisdiction to decide an issue, a question of law is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14177 - 2005-03-31
and jurisdiction to decide an issue, a question of law is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14177 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Kleser, 2010 WI 88, ¶36, 328 Wis. 2d 42, 786 N.W.2d 144
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102169 - 2013-09-24
interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Kleser, 2010 WI 88, ¶36, 328 Wis. 2d 42, 786 N.W.2d 144
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102169 - 2013-09-24
State v. Kenneth Fowler
we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2950 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2950 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standards to undisputed facts, which presents a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805050 - 2024-05-23
standards to undisputed facts, which presents a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805050 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177973 - 2017-09-21
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
credit pursuant to that statute is a question of law we review de novo, see State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122265 - 2014-09-23
credit pursuant to that statute is a question of law we review de novo, see State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122265 - 2014-09-23