Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17591 - 17600 of 68527 for did.
Search results 17591 - 17600 of 68527 for did.
2007 WI APP 199
standard, and that the record did not support its decision. It reversed the board’s decision and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29820 - 2007-08-27
standard, and that the record did not support its decision. It reversed the board’s decision and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29820 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not to introduce in the presence of the jury. We conclude the Department did not commit prosecutorial misconduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242941 - 2019-06-27
not to introduce in the presence of the jury. We conclude the Department did not commit prosecutorial misconduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242941 - 2019-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court violated its mandatory duties and must allege the parent did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542774 - 2022-07-19
that the circuit court violated its mandatory duties and must allege the parent did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542774 - 2022-07-19
State v. Gary K.
if it is in the child's best interest. Under the facts of this case, the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8603 - 2005-03-31
if it is in the child's best interest. Under the facts of this case, the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to cause harm to Huber or his family if he did not comply. The jury convicted Huber on all counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201052 - 2017-11-08
to cause harm to Huber or his family if he did not comply. The jury convicted Huber on all counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201052 - 2017-11-08
Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to review this case because Gimenez failed to serve the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14014 - 2005-03-31
that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to review this case because Gimenez failed to serve the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
staff noted that this story did not make sense, as only one of the child’s legs was burned, as opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445604 - 2021-10-26
staff noted that this story did not make sense, as only one of the child’s legs was burned, as opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445604 - 2021-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal complaint from the case against Brooks into evidence to support the argument that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116147 - 2017-09-21
the criminal complaint from the case against Brooks into evidence to support the argument that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the jury did not hear his allegedly exculpatory statement. Because the exculpatory statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
because the jury did not hear his allegedly exculpatory statement. Because the exculpatory statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03