Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17591 - 17600 of 58546 for speedy trial.

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
of her arms. After a six day jury trial, Koopmans was convicted on both counts. The circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
) the trial court erred by excluding evidence of other trailers in similarly zoned areas. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14482 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
by trial.” After providing five pages of standards of review and relevant legal principles for at least
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128232 - 2014-11-10

State v. Deondre J. Kelley
argues that he should be resentenced because: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7423 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lois Tabar v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
to support the jury's verdict, we deny the appellants' request for a new trial and affirm. This dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7855 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
offender. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Shirley A. Smedema v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance Company
. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. PER CURIAM. Shirley A. Smedema appeals from the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10562 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 103
and shall set a date for the trial and investigation of the charges, following the procedure under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29743 - 2014-09-15

David Thurin v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
that the trial court erred in its conclusions regarding the application of statutes of limitation, the discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9955 - 2005-03-31

David Thurin v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
that the trial court erred in its conclusions regarding the application of statutes of limitation, the discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9609 - 2005-03-31