Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 2160 for Victor Garcia.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 2160 for Victor Garcia.
State v. Kevin R.
forth in § 802.08(2), Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis. 2d 287, 294, 481 N.W.2d 660 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4480 - 2005-03-31
forth in § 802.08(2), Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis. 2d 287, 294, 481 N.W.2d 660 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4480 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
bearing on an important issue, Garcia v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 651, 245 N.W.2d 654 (1976). ¶27 Wallace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661437 - 2023-05-31
bearing on an important issue, Garcia v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 651, 245 N.W.2d 654 (1976). ¶27 Wallace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661437 - 2023-05-31
State v. Todd W. Timblin
presents a “fair and just reason” to justify the withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861, 532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4894 - 2005-03-31
presents a “fair and just reason” to justify the withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861, 532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at around 11:00 p.m. in a rural part of Sawyer County. See United States v. Garcia, 751 F.3d 1139, 1145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948799 - 2025-04-29
at around 11:00 p.m. in a rural part of Sawyer County. See United States v. Garcia, 751 F.3d 1139, 1145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948799 - 2025-04-29
[PDF]
State v. William J. Murphy
ground to remove the issues from the case. (quoting United States v. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11144 - 2017-09-19
ground to remove the issues from the case. (quoting United States v. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11144 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shaun P. Lynch
reason, unless the prosecution will be substantially prejudiced. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-03-31
reason, unless the prosecution will be substantially prejudiced. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin R.
a challenge to summary judgment de novo, applying the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Garcia v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4480 - 2017-09-19
a challenge to summary judgment de novo, applying the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Garcia v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4480 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Carnemolla
disbelief of the defendant’s testimony); see also, State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 863, 532 N.W.2d 111, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
disbelief of the defendant’s testimony); see also, State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 863, 532 N.W.2d 111, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 123
. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (accepting conviction despite contention of innocence), State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21
. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (accepting conviction despite contention of innocence), State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21
State v. William J. Murphy
. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174 (1st Cir. 1993)).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11144 - 2005-03-31
. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174 (1st Cir. 1993)).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11144 - 2005-03-31