Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 2158 for Victor Garcia.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 2158 for Victor Garcia.
[PDF]
WI APP 123
. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (accepting conviction despite contention of innocence), State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21
. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (accepting conviction despite contention of innocence), State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shaun P. Lynch
reason, unless the prosecution will be substantially prejudiced. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-03-31
reason, unless the prosecution will be substantially prejudiced. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd W. Timblin
the withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). “But ‘freely’ does not mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4894 - 2017-09-19
the withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). “But ‘freely’ does not mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4894 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William J. Murphy
ground to remove the issues from the case. (quoting United States v. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11144 - 2017-09-19
ground to remove the issues from the case. (quoting United States v. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11144 - 2017-09-19
State v. William J. Murphy
. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174 (1st Cir. 1993)).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11144 - 2005-03-31
. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1174 (1st Cir. 1993)).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11144 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin R.
a challenge to summary judgment de novo, applying the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Garcia v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4480 - 2017-09-19
a challenge to summary judgment de novo, applying the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Garcia v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4480 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970); see also State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 856, 532 N.W.2d 111
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256683 - 2020-03-16
v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970); see also State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 856, 532 N.W.2d 111
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256683 - 2020-03-16
State v. Todd W. Timblin
presents a “fair and just reason” to justify the withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861, 532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4894 - 2005-03-31
presents a “fair and just reason” to justify the withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861, 532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a credibility battle between [the defendant] and the victim[.]” Finally, in Garcia v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 651
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
“a credibility battle between [the defendant] and the victim[.]” Finally, in Garcia v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 651
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
State v. Robert Carnemolla
of the defendant’s testimony); see also, State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 863, 532 N.W.2d 111, 118 (1995), a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
of the defendant’s testimony); see also, State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 863, 532 N.W.2d 111, 118 (1995), a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21