Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 4817 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Double Krui Selatan Pesisir Barat.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 4817 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Double Krui Selatan Pesisir Barat.
State v. Pervis Merritt
, 277 N.W.2d 462, 464-65 (Ct. App. 1979). Multiple convictions for the same offense violate the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
, 277 N.W.2d 462, 464-65 (Ct. App. 1979). Multiple convictions for the same offense violate the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reconfinement order violated Bowers’s equal protection rights and improperly subjected him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
reconfinement order violated Bowers’s equal protection rights and improperly subjected him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adverse to the State “if the appeal would not be prohibited by constitutional protections against double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
adverse to the State “if the appeal would not be prohibited by constitutional protections against double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
from two No. 2008AP2412-CR 2 counts of hit and run violate double jeopardy because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44959 - 2014-09-15
from two No. 2008AP2412-CR 2 counts of hit and run violate double jeopardy because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44959 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David G. Alexander
) by not ruling that his prosecution was barred by the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11091 - 2017-09-19
) by not ruling that his prosecution was barred by the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11091 - 2017-09-19
State v. Billy J. Doudna
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
double damages, or $6800, attorney’s fees, and costs. ¶8 Katia answered, and then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
double damages, or $6800, attorney’s fees, and costs. ¶8 Katia answered, and then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
The Double Jeopardy Clause, embodied in both the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31
The Double Jeopardy Clause, embodied in both the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Kidd v. Dianna L. McMaster
, the awarding of double damages and attorney fees encourages those injured by unfair trade practices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6030 - 2017-09-19
, the awarding of double damages and attorney fees encourages those injured by unfair trade practices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21