Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 68499 for did.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 68499 for did.
Ronald Wolfe v. Kenneth Morgan
him on the head and had cut him on the chest. He repeatedly stated that he did not know the names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11694 - 2005-03-31
him on the head and had cut him on the chest. He repeatedly stated that he did not know the names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11694 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 13, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
Court record indicates that on August 21, 2012, the City did not move to dismiss the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132809 - 2015-01-12
Court record indicates that on August 21, 2012, the City did not move to dismiss the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132809 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s plea agreement. Doege also said that he did not understand various aspects of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
the State’s plea agreement. Doege also said that he did not understand various aspects of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
State v. Sheila L. Hardnett
erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing her because the trial court did not discuss the three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12545 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing her because the trial court did not discuss the three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12545 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darryl A. Harding
. The State contends that the trial court erred in finding that the arresting officer did not have “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
. The State contends that the trial court erred in finding that the arresting officer did not have “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion to withdraw the plea. He alleges his plea was unknowing because he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36872 - 2009-07-20
his motion to withdraw the plea. He alleges his plea was unknowing because he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36872 - 2009-07-20
State v. Xavier B. Smith
cross-examination did not prejudice the defense, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21024 - 2006-01-23
cross-examination did not prejudice the defense, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21024 - 2006-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
[.]” He did not intend to convey any information about what other drivers were going to do. McLaughlin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102470 - 2013-09-30
[.]” He did not intend to convey any information about what other drivers were going to do. McLaughlin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102470 - 2013-09-30
State v. Derwin D. Jones
for money, which he did not give her. Jones denied using a knife. ¶3 At trial, the victim testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3588 - 2005-03-31
for money, which he did not give her. Jones denied using a knife. ¶3 At trial, the victim testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3588 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sheila L. Hardnett
in sentencing her because the trial court did not discuss the three primary factors that underlie the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31
in sentencing her because the trial court did not discuss the three primary factors that underlie the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31