Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) and to recommend five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision on each count, to run
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117321 - 2017-09-21
) and to recommend five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision on each count, to run
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in prison with eligibility for extended supervision after twenty-two years of confinement. At sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
in prison with eligibility for extended supervision after twenty-two years of confinement. At sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision on the reckless homicide charge and to five
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154654 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision on the reckless homicide charge and to five
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. Baker appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Christopher D. Sobic, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237981 - 2019-03-21
of extended supervision. Baker appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Christopher D. Sobic, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237981 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. The State recommended a total sentence of two years of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251695 - 2019-12-23
years of extended supervision. The State recommended a total sentence of two years of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251695 - 2019-12-23
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141571 - 2015-05-07
confinement and six years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141571 - 2015-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
on Doll’s person. He was arrested and charged. At the time of this incident, Doll was on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33034 - 2008-06-16
on Doll’s person. He was arrested and charged. At the time of this incident, Doll was on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33034 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
and extended supervision to run concurrently to a sentence he was then serving. His extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30157 - 2014-09-15
and extended supervision to run concurrently to a sentence he was then serving. His extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30157 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of imprisonment (maximum forty years of initial confinement and maximum twenty years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216448 - 2018-08-01
of imprisonment (maximum forty years of initial confinement and maximum twenty years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216448 - 2018-08-01
[PDF]
State v. Paul C. Wozny
confinement and forty-five years of extended supervision. 1 After sentencing, Wozny moved to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6468 - 2017-09-19
confinement and forty-five years of extended supervision. 1 After sentencing, Wozny moved to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6468 - 2017-09-19