Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 6143 for li.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 6143 for li.
COURT OF APPEALS
credibility determination. The jury determined that Huml lied about paying Krisik and thus Huml intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35285 - 2009-01-20
credibility determination. The jury determined that Huml lied about paying Krisik and thus Huml intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35285 - 2009-01-20
John R. Ammerman v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
that lies in the Wisconsin River floodplain. He contends that the circuit court erred by remanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13123 - 2005-03-31
that lies in the Wisconsin River floodplain. He contends that the circuit court erred by remanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13123 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy L. Walker
lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15266 - 2012-03-15
lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15266 - 2012-03-15
State v. Francisco Mata
, the remedy lies with the legislature, not the courts.” LaCrosse Lutheran Hosp. v. LaCrosse County, 133 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
, the remedy lies with the legislature, not the courts.” LaCrosse Lutheran Hosp. v. LaCrosse County, 133 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amanda L. Gear
lies within the trial court’s discretion. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 681, 499 N.W.2d 631
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6275 - 2005-03-31
lies within the trial court’s discretion. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 681, 499 N.W.2d 631
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the recanting witness lied under oath in his or her original testimony. Id. at 476. A. Additional Facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77188 - 2014-09-15
that the recanting witness lied under oath in his or her original testimony. Id. at 476. A. Additional Facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77188 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
” in that it involves an admission that the recanting witness lied under oath in his or her original testimony. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77188 - 2012-02-07
” in that it involves an admission that the recanting witness lied under oath in his or her original testimony. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77188 - 2012-02-07
[PDF]
August 2023 Table of Unpublished Opinions
Vacated and cause remanded 2021AP001289 Chong-Le Li v. William Haus 07-27-2023 Affirmed
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707076 - 2023-09-21
Vacated and cause remanded 2021AP001289 Chong-Le Li v. William Haus 07-27-2023 Affirmed
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707076 - 2023-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not weigh the facts as McKindra hoped, the determination of what is relevant at sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
not weigh the facts as McKindra hoped, the determination of what is relevant at sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
follows. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion. State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161770 - 2017-09-21
follows. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion. State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161770 - 2017-09-21