Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 9126 for op.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for review in the case of City of Madison v. Family Business LLC, No. 2012AP2179, unpublished slip op. (WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189243 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nathaniel Whaley
, unpublished summary op. at 5 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 3, 1994). At the evidentiary hearing following remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10114 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the judgment on direct appeal. See State v. Jackson, No. 2004AP1536-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31655 - 2008-01-28

[PDF] State v. Leslie M. Pirk
of the trial court. Elam, slip op. at 1. However, the supreme court did not remand to the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8222 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Comstock Dairy Enterprises, Inc. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company
., No. 02-2005, unpublished slip op. at ¶1 (WI App Mar. 11, 2003) (Comstock I). Although the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7101 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. We affirmed. See State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Schwarz, No. 2010AP777, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92114 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the stop. ¶16 In State v. Burton, No. 2009AP180, unpublished slip op. ¶¶14-15, 19, 24-25 (Ct. App. Sep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184639 - 2017-09-21

WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2119 Complete Title of...
to be provided by the county.” Sec. 59.45(1)(a)2.; see also 69 Wis. Op. Att’y Gen. 160, 164 (1980) (“Copies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114760 - 2015-06-03

COURT OF APPEALS
description. [4] See State v. Foster, No. 2011AP1673, unpublished op. and order (WI App Dec. 10, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121152 - 2015-01-25

State v. Leslie M. Pirk
, but was equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the trial court. Elam, slip op. at 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31