Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 83387 for simple case search.
State v. Keith B. Kelly
hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered to assist in the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered to assist in the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he and his wife were the owners in fee simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
that he and his wife were the owners in fee simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession. The complaint alleges that Schultz has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78507 - 2012-02-22
simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession. The complaint alleges that Schultz has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78507 - 2012-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Keith B. Kelly
elicited in prior evidentiary hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2514 - 2017-09-19
elicited in prior evidentiary hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2514 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1549-CR 2 an inventory search after a traffic stop. Specifically, he argues that the scope
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241792 - 2019-06-05
. No. 2018AP1549-CR 2 an inventory search after a traffic stop. Specifically, he argues that the scope
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241792 - 2019-06-05
Frontsheet
to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases, State v. Johnson and State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66883 - 2011-06-28
to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases, State v. Johnson and State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66883 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
WI 49
in question was not enough to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66883 - 2014-09-15
in question was not enough to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 49
absent Jackson’s incriminating statements, the search warrant affidavit in this case contained ample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141620 - 2017-09-21
absent Jackson’s incriminating statements, the search warrant affidavit in this case contained ample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141620 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
, that a search or seizure occurred in this case that required authorization by a warrant. We therefore decide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52412 - 2010-07-19
, that a search or seizure occurred in this case that required authorization by a warrant. We therefore decide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52412 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
WI 92
not to resolve the first issue, and assume, without deciding, that a search or seizure occurred in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52412 - 2014-09-15
not to resolve the first issue, and assume, without deciding, that a search or seizure occurred in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52412 - 2014-09-15