Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 3429 for y's.
Search results 1761 - 1770 of 3429 for y's.
Robert Ruffer v. Town of Monroe - Board of Review
parcels in the Township [since] [b]y these properties being under assessed, [Ruffer] was subject to high
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
parcels in the Township [since] [b]y these properties being under assessed, [Ruffer] was subject to high
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
%2fdefault.wl&findtype=Y&rlti=1 - B00881976108704 Id., 72 Wis. 2d at 363, 241 N.W.2d at 166. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35269 - 2009-01-20
%2fdefault.wl&findtype=Y&rlti=1 - B00881976108704 Id., 72 Wis. 2d at 363, 241 N.W.2d at 166. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35269 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Ricky A. Myhre
[because] [y]ou cannot be given a greater sentence simply because you availed yourself of a trial. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21
[because] [y]ou cannot be given a greater sentence simply because you availed yourself of a trial. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not apply.” The statute upon which Sterling relies, WIS. STAT. § 766.60, does not “specif[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1056714 - 2025-12-30
not apply.” The statute upon which Sterling relies, WIS. STAT. § 766.60, does not “specif[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1056714 - 2025-12-30
State v. John Warren
,” and the prosecutor followed with, “[y]ou’re a career criminal, aren’t you?” At this point Warren’s attorney objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
,” and the prosecutor followed with, “[y]ou’re a career criminal, aren’t you?” At this point Warren’s attorney objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he “smoked some weed and some dab[.]” When asked, “[Y]es or no, Mr. Westley, you lied to [G.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279472 - 2020-08-18
that he “smoked some weed and some dab[.]” When asked, “[Y]es or no, Mr. Westley, you lied to [G.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279472 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
Ryan Joseph Pierce v. Kimberly Jean Pierce
?DB=595&SerialNum=1992103193&Fi ndType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&ReferencePosition=374&AP=&RS=WLW2.83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5779 - 2017-09-19
?DB=595&SerialNum=1992103193&Fi ndType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&ReferencePosition=374&AP=&RS=WLW2.83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5779 - 2017-09-19
Frank P. Holzberger v. Evelyn C. Holzberger
. The trial court stated: “So I think [Frank] had plenty of opportunity to say, [‘Y]ou know what, I need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18537 - 2005-06-13
. The trial court stated: “So I think [Frank] had plenty of opportunity to say, [‘Y]ou know what, I need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18537 - 2005-06-13
State v. Perry A. Felton
or later because, he claimed, “[m]y attorney didn’t consult with me” even though he had alerted the lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6831 - 2005-03-31
or later because, he claimed, “[m]y attorney didn’t consult with me” even though he had alerted the lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6831 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
police, “[y]ou guys know” what happened. ¶33 Kissack also argues that, unlike the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22
police, “[y]ou guys know” what happened. ¶33 Kissack also argues that, unlike the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22