Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
exists is a question of law, which we review de novo. The existence of a new factor does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53891 - 2014-09-15
exists is a question of law, which we review de novo. The existence of a new factor does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald Harris
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cochran v. Public Service Commission
is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 290-91, 538 N.W.2d 588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14177 - 2014-09-15
is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 290-91, 538 N.W.2d 588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14177 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365090 - 2021-05-12
they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365090 - 2021-05-12
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis.2d 222, 229, 499 N.W.2d 218, 221 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13583 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis.2d 222, 229, 499 N.W.2d 218, 221 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry F. Hurley
or case law standards to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15196 - 2017-09-21
or case law standards to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
due process raise[s a] question[] of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo.” Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208765 - 2018-02-27
due process raise[s a] question[] of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo.” Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208765 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
Phillip G. Epping v. City of Neillsville Common Council
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12067 - 2017-09-21
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Committee
, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16146 - 2017-09-21
, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16146 - 2017-09-21