Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29821 for des.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶10 Here, the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77521 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶10 Here, the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77521 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v. Boltz, 133 Wis. 2d 278, 284, 395 N.W.2d 605 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7446 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v. Boltz, 133 Wis. 2d 278, 284, 395 N.W.2d 605 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7446 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William R. Junnor
of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
material facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447887 - 2021-11-02
material facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447887 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied Swieca’s motion, and Swieca moved for a de novo hearing in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96228 - 2014-09-15
commissioner denied Swieca’s motion, and Swieca moved for a de novo hearing in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations that are sufficient to require a hearing presents an additional question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21
allegations that are sufficient to require a hearing presents an additional question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25 (2007-08).[2] ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41950 - 2009-10-07
pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25 (2007-08).[2] ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41950 - 2009-10-07
City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31