Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
the 5 Although our review in this case requires a de novo interpretation of § 343.305(9), STATS., we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12913 - 2017-09-21
the 5 Although our review in this case requires a de novo interpretation of § 343.305(9), STATS., we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12913 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461544 - 2021-12-09
of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461544 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
Charles Chvala v. Danford C. Bubolz
). We are not bound by the trial court's conclusions and review the matter de novo. First Nat'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
). We are not bound by the trial court's conclusions and review the matter de novo. First Nat'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jared J.
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12837 - 2017-09-21
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26093 - 2017-09-21
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed the claims. Appellants appeal. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109084 - 2017-09-21
and dismissed the claims. Appellants appeal. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109084 - 2017-09-21
Cochran v. Public Service Commission
and jurisdiction to decide an issue, a question of law is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14177 - 2005-03-31
and jurisdiction to decide an issue, a question of law is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14177 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. ¶7 EE argues that the circuit court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. ¶7 EE argues that the circuit court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
State v. Tyrone Jackson
application of the penalty enhancers is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9180 - 2005-03-31
application of the penalty enhancers is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9180 - 2005-03-31