Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Cochran v. Public Service Commission
is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 290-91, 538 N.W.2d 588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14177 - 2014-09-15
is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 290-91, 538 N.W.2d 588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14177 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 126
amounted to conversion is a question of law which we review de novo. Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102248 - 2017-09-21
amounted to conversion is a question of law which we review de novo. Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102248 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5453 - 2017-09-19
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73242 - 2014-09-15
disagree. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73242 - 2014-09-15
WI App 138 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP225-CR Complete Tit...
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2005-03-31
CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
things. Meis filed a motion for a de novo hearing, claiming “[t]he competency of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2005-03-31
things. Meis filed a motion for a de novo hearing, claiming “[t]he competency of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶31. ¶8 Here, Williams argues that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶31. ¶8 Here, Williams argues that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26