Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Anthony T. Jones
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001 WI App 102, ¶8, 244 Wis. 2d 17, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24927 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001 WI App 102, ¶8, 244 Wis. 2d 17, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24927 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eldon Boddie v. David H. Schwarz
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11271 - 2017-09-19
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11271 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
and interest. ¶5 Barbara requested and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6672 - 2017-09-20
and interest. ¶5 Barbara requested and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6672 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Kelly F. Mulder v. MSI Insurance Company
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Seep v. Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11043 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Seep v. Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11043 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karleen K. Raasch
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
Jerome J. Hein v. Thomas N. Frieberg
facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ynocencio v. Fesko, 114 Wis. 2d 391, 396, 338 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ynocencio v. Fesko, 114 Wis. 2d 391, 396, 338 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50966 - 2014-09-15
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50966 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 42
” and thus “great weight” deference is inappropriate. De novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15
” and thus “great weight” deference is inappropriate. De novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15