Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17601 - 17610 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Percell L. Parker
to the following statement made by the court: “[A]lthough I do believe [Mrs.] Stefanski that she brought the stuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31
to the following statement made by the court: “[A]lthough I do believe [Mrs.] Stefanski that she brought the stuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tom Sweeney
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10020 - 2005-03-31
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Aire, based upon allegedly untrue, deceptive, or misleading statements in Country Aire’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32910 - 2014-09-15
Aire, based upon allegedly untrue, deceptive, or misleading statements in Country Aire’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Stewart
and to arrest Stewart. The court also found that Stewart’s statements to the officers made prior to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3594 - 2017-09-19
and to arrest Stewart. The court also found that Stewart’s statements to the officers made prior to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In postconviction proceedings, Haywood alleged that he had newly discovered evidence, namely, a statement from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250562 - 2019-11-22
. In postconviction proceedings, Haywood alleged that he had newly discovered evidence, namely, a statement from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250562 - 2019-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Fred J. Odell
on that. The prosecutor's statements explaining how and by whom Exhibit 4 was created are not evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9273 - 2017-09-19
on that. The prosecutor's statements explaining how and by whom Exhibit 4 was created are not evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9273 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lester Young
are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15919 - 2017-09-21
are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circuit court’s statement out of context, and a consideration of that context defeats Martin’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56964 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s statement out of context, and a consideration of that context defeats Martin’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56964 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tom Sweeney
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tom Sweeney
of the evidence, Sweeney made a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence, Sweeney made a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19